Judge
Paul Hawkes, while he was Chief Judge of the First DCA, wrote the opinion
reversing the sentencing in two cases involving Anthony Payne. In the case, Payne v State, Judge Paul Hawkes
explained that the failure to provide counsel was fundamental. Fundamental
error means the courts have found the class or error, or type of error, so
severe, or significant, that it does not have to be preserved or does the
‘harmless error doctrine apply. Because the error was fundamental, Judge Paul
Hawkes and the court had no option but to vacate the sentencing and remand for
yet another resentencing.
In the last
sentence Judge Paul Hawkes wrote,
“On remand, the trial court has the authority in both cases to impose any
sentence permitted by law, including the term originally imposed during the
challenged resentencing.” This sentence shows that Judge Paul Hawkes and the
panel recognized that the error in sentencing that caused the previous reversal
might have been only a technical error. The defendant may have the exact same
sentence imposed even though it had now been twice reversed – in this case
where Judge Paul Hawkes wrote the opinion, and in the previous appeal.
No comments:
Post a Comment